Discovery earns the build
If the discovery does not change what gets built, it was not a discovery — it was a demo with stakeholders in the room.
Support Operations & AI Automation Leader
Marcio Prado shipped LLM-powered virtual agents into live global support workflows and measured 32% ticket deflection. He came up through that same support organization first: major incidents, escalations, root-cause analysis, endpoint security across enterprise and MSP environments worldwide.
Career
Nothing here started with AI. It started with a room of people who had never used a computer, and it moved through governance under aviation regulators, sole ownership of a product, and years on a security support queue before an agent was ever scoped. The instincts are decades old. Only the vocabulary changed.
Future Informática São Paulo, Brazil
Taught people who had never touched a computer, then repaired the machines when they broke. Homes and small businesses, no abstraction layer between the work and the person paying for it. Every role since is that job at larger scale.
EJ Escola de Aeronáutica / Flight Training Center São Paulo, Brazil
Ran IT for a regulated aviation-training organization: federated governance, multi-year delivery through Scrum, Kanban and SAFe, and the procurement lifecycle for flight simulators. Internal audit, enterprise risk management, SoX controls and civil-aviation compliance all wanted evidence. He produced it.
Independent · Clear Sky Aviation English São Paulo, Brazil (remote)
Sole product and technology owner of Clear Sky Aviation English, concept to production: discovery, implementation, vendors, reliability, cost.
Kaseya Orlando, Florida
Advanced support for Datto EDR, Datto AV and RocketCyber: deployments, alerting, endpoint protection and RMM integration failures for MSP partners. The queue itself, worked ticket by ticket. Promoted into support leadership within 16 months.
Kaseya Orlando, Florida
Led security technical support for Datto EDR/AV across enterprise and MSP environments worldwide. Coached L2/L3 specialists, took the senior escalation seat on high-impact situations, and owned major incident response and root-cause analysis end to end with product and engineering.
Kaseya Orlando, Florida
Owns agentic AI across global support and billing operations, discovery through evaluation. Shipped the virtual agents that reached 32% ticket deflection, built the MCP integrations that read their conversations, and wrote the security and compliance case behind the rollout.
Every number on this site traces to a dated role. Nothing here is modelled, projected or rounded up.
Signature case · Agentic support operations
Repeat questions and hard escalations compete for the same queue. Every support organization eventually pays for that.
The answerable tickets absorb the capacity the difficult ones need, and the people best equipped to handle a major incident spend their day on password resets and deployment questions.
The decision that mattered was sequence. Discovery ran first, with support, product, engineering, security and business leaders — the people who own the workflow and the people who work it. Agent scope was drawn against real ticket patterns, with explicit handoff points where a human takes the conversation back. The model came last.
What got built: LLM-powered virtual agents using Ada and Mosaic AI, wired into Zendesk-based workflows across global support and billing operations. Then the part most programs skip. MCP server integrations connect the Mosaic API and Ada to read what the agents actually said, surface failure patterns, and feed the fixes back into the workflow.
It held because the security and compliance case was written for the rollout rather than after it. That document is what made enterprise adoption possible, and the guardrails on customer-facing use came out of the same work.
Method
None of these are model problems. They are the reasons agent programs stall between a working demo and a working queue.
If the discovery does not change what gets built, it was not a discovery — it was a demo with stakeholders in the room.
Security review is part of the build, not the last gate before launch; anything approved after the fact was approved without evidence.
An agent that closes a ticket the customer needed a human for has not deflected anything, it has deferred it — which is why the number is only trustworthy next to what the conversations show.
Agent quality drifts the moment the product changes, and without conversation-level evaluation you find out from the escalation queue instead of from your own reporting.
If the specialists working the queue would not use it, the rollout is already dead, whatever the launch dashboard says.
Automation has to be explainable by the specialist defending it on a live escalation, so a workflow anyone can read beats a model nobody can account for.
What he is hired for
Engagements end with artifacts a team can keep using. The list under each area is what actually gets handed over.
Virtual agents designed, shipped and optimized inside the tooling support already runs on, owned from stakeholder discovery through rollout.
Workflow maps · Agent scope and containment rules · Human handoff design · Rollout plan and cutover sequence · Deflection reporting
The plumbing that reads what agents actually said, names the failure patterns and turns them into a change queue rather than an opinion.
MCP server integrations · Conversation analysis pipeline · Failure-pattern taxonomy · Evaluation sets · Improvement backlog with owners
Escalation paths, incident command and root-cause analysis run end to end, with product and engineering pulled in before the customer asks twice.
Escalation practices · Major-incident response and communication cadence · Root-cause write-ups · L2/L3 coaching plans · Knowledge-base content
The written case that gets customer-facing AI approved, plus the guardrails it has to run inside once it is live.
Security and compliance case · Guardrail and data-handling boundaries · Responsible-use rules for customer-facing agents · Review-ready documentation
Decision rights, prioritization and supplier discipline for technology estates that regulators and auditors will eventually read.
Federated governance model · Prioritization and accountability practices · Vendor and procurement lifecycle · Audit-support documentation
Content built so both the customer and the agent can answer the question, because a deflection program is a knowledge program wearing new clothes.
Knowledge-base architecture · Article standards · Self-service content sets · Specialist enablement · Delivery in English, Portuguese and Spanish
Selected work
Twenty-eight years compresses into three projects: one in production now, one built alone end to end, and one that ran under auditors.
LLM-powered virtual agents shipped into live Zendesk workflows, then instrumented so the result holds after launch week.
An aviation-English e-learning platform taken from first conversation to running service by a single owner.
Governance, delivery and procurement inside a regulated flight-training organization, under internal audit and civil-aviation compliance.
Beyond the work
Nearly a decade inside a flight-training organization leaves 3 habits behind. Each one shows up in how the AI work gets run.
Aviation does not trust recall under pressure, and neither should an AI rollout. Guardrails are written down before go-live because a competent operator remembering the edge case is not a control.
A simulator exists so failure costs nothing. Evaluation sets do the same job for agents: break the workflow in a room where no customer is watching, then decide what ships.
Aviation improved by investigating what went wrong and publishing it. Root-cause analysis is that habit with worse paperwork, and the pattern across incidents is always worth more than the story of any one of them.
Words
This site is self-attested today. The work is verifiable through the people who were in the room, but the quotes are not written, and putting words in someone’s mouth would cost more credibility than it buys.
Worked with him on a rollout, an escalation or a governance review? A short quote and your name is worth more here than any adjective he could write about himself. Reach him at the contact page.
Available for talks and workshops on shipping agentic AI into live support operations: discovery, guardrails, rollout, and the evaluation loop that keeps deflection honest. In English, Portuguese or Spanish.
Writing on agentic AI in support operations is published here first. For interviews or commentary, the fastest route is email.
Contact
Most agentic AI programs stall in the same 3 places: a workflow nobody validated with the people who work the queue, a security review nobody wrote the case for, and an evaluation loop nobody built, so quality drifts unnoticed. None of those are model problems. They are operations problems, and they are the ones worth a conversation.
Describe the stall in plain language and you will get a straight answer about whether this is the right help — including when it is not. Orlando, Florida. Originally São Paulo, Brazil. Working in English, Portuguese and Spanish.